We strive for exceptional service.

Our firm strives to provide exceptional service to both our clients and our attorneys. We want to ensure every client knows they are valued, while every attorney knows they are supported.

Madilynn Banks

Law Clerk

Our law firm builds technology to solve your legal needs.

We use it to provide efficient and effective legal services at scale.

CallerHQ

Join the Fight Against Spammers

Our mobile app allows you to report telephone spam to our law firm. We partner with you to take legal actions against the spammers. Protect your privacy and stop annoying calls and texts - join the team today.

You Report Phone, Text, and Voicemail Spam
We Take a Deep Dive Into The Digital Data
The Evidence Is Used To Take Legal Action

Learn More

Recent News

Court Grants Class Certification and Appoints LawHQ as Class Counsel in Shutler v. Citizens Disability

September 9, 2024

In a significant ruling, the Southern District of Florida granted class certification in the case of Shutler v. Citizens Disability. The Court appointed LawHQ as class counsel and noted LawHQ has "extensive experience litigating TCPA class action lawsuits." The lawsuit, filed by Michael Shutler, claims that Citizens Disability violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by making unsolicited prerecorded calls.

Despite the Citizens' challenge to class certification, the court found Shutler satisfied all the requisites of 23(a) and 23(b)(3). Notably, the Court held that common legal issues predominated over individual ones, making a class action the superior method for adjudicating the case. This ruling enables thousands of consumers to seek relief for unwanted telemarketing calls, marking a significant victory for consumer rights and reinforcing LawHQ's role as a leader in TCPA litigation.

Read Opinion

Court Affirms CEMA and TCPA Violations in Walker-Schaut v. Lido Labs

May 24, 2024

LawHQ successfully defeated a motion to dismiss in Walker-Schaut v. Lido Labs, a class action brought under Washington's Commercial Electronic Mail Act (CEMA) and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The court made a handful of significant rulings: First, that CEMA violations are actionable under Washington's Consumer Protection Act (CPA). Second, that failing to identify the sender in text messages violates the TCPA regulations, specifically 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200(d). Third, that the prohibition on making telephone solicitations to phone numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry applies to text messages. This is another big win for consumers nationwide who want to hold companies liable for their intrusive telemarketing.

Read Opinion

LawHQ Delivers Significant Consumer Protection Victory before the Ninth Circuit in Chennette v. Porch

October 12, 2022

LawHQ has won a landmark appeal in the case of Chennette v. Porch. The plaintiffs, who were 51 different clients of our firm, were home improvement contractors who had received unsolicited text messages from the companies GoSmith and Porch.com, offering potential customer leads. The crux of the case revolved around whether the plaintiffs had the right to take action for violations of the do-not-call registry, as they used their phone numbers for both residential and business purposes. The district court initially dismissed the case, siding with the defendants who argued that the plaintiffs lacked statutory standing as the phone numbers were business lines.

Undeterred, LawHQ took the case to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a significant ruling, the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s decision, establishing a crucial precedent. The court held that there is a presumption that a cell phone placed on the do-not-call registry is residential! This ruling helps protect consumers who use their phone numbers for both personal and business purposes from unsolicited calls and messages. It clarifies that these individuals have the right to seek damages for violations of the TCPA, lending more power to consumers and small businesses alike in their fight against invasive and unwanted telephone spam.

Read Opinion

What Our Clients Say About Us

Best app and it is free. I like how I can report spam texts and calls. I never had a text message from any other app asking if I had any questions ... they are attentive if you have any issues!!!

Google Play Store Review by Catherine F.

The app works for me without issues. LawHQ has submitted multiple lawsuits against spanners and scammers on my behalf. Thank you LawHQ.

Google Play Store Review by Hector B.

While using this app, I did manage to get added as one of the plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit against a spammer based on one of the spam callers I reported.

Google Play Store Review by Hafh'drn C.

I've got to say this is great idea to be able to speak with someone like this if a customer has questions or issues. I want to thank you personally for having this chat messaging as part of the app. I don't think I have ever had a legit app that actually followed thru with what they advertised and then to have a system like this for one on one. So, thank you for being LEGIT and smarter than all of the other apps that don't follow thru with what they offer.

Client Chat by Katherine V.